论文部分内容阅读
2003年,随着河南博爱县唐村发现了一份落款为“康熙五十五年岁次丙申秋七月”的《李氏家谱》抄本后,随即与此密切相关的碑刻、武术文献等也开始陆续进入人们视野。依据这批材料,史学界与武术界曾经激烈争辩过的两大问题似乎可迎刃而解:一是曾被不少学者怀疑的明末李自成农民起义军将领李岩等当是博爱县唐村人;二是关于风靡海内外的太极拳应源自唐村。那么这批材料可信度如何呢?文章分别对家谱、碑刻以及具有代表性的武术拳谱进行了条分缕析的甄别与分析,认为其中既有明显的作伪者,也有需进一步条贯厘定者,还有较为珍贵的文献材料,难以用一言以蔽之的“真”或“伪”来截然加以断定,需要做进一步的辨伪、廓清。
In 2003, with the discovery of a copy of the “Li Family Tree” transcribed as “Kangxi’s 55-year-old C Shenqiuqiu” in Tang Village, Bo’ai County, Henan Province, the inscriptions and martial arts Literature, etc. have also begun to gradually enter people’s vision. According to these materials, the history and martial arts circles have fiercely argued that the two major problems seem to be solved: First, many scholars have been suspected of suspicion by the end of the Ming Dynasty Li Zicheng peasant rebel army generals Li Yan Dengxian is fraternity Tangcun people; the second is Tai Chi on popular home and abroad should come from Tang village. So what is the credibility of these materials? The article separately analyzes and analyzes the genealogy, inscriptions and the representative martial arts fist spectrum, and finds that there are obvious fake persons, but also need to be further determined, There are more precious literature and materials, it is difficult to use the word “true ” or “pseudo ” to be conclusively concluded that the need to do further discrimination and clarification.