对质诘问权起源于一个简单的命题:被指控犯罪的人,有权当面挑战、质疑指控他的人。该制度原是英美法体制下的产物,后经不断发展,现已成为各法系司法体制所确认的刑事被告人拥有的基本权利之一。实践证明,对质诘问权对保障真实发现、法治程序以及法律的和平性等刑事诉讼目的有着重要的意义。然而,这项具有普世价值的基本人权,在我国刑事程序法上却一直未受到应有的重视。在现行审判实践中,证人不出庭问题极为普遍,法庭上仅由公诉方宣读证 The right to confrontation stems from a simple proposition that persons accused of crimes have the right to face challenges and question the persons accused of them. The system was originally a product of Anglo-American legal system. After its continuous development, it has become one of the basic rights of criminal defendants recognized by judicial systems of various legal systems. Practice has proved that the right to ask questions of quality is of great significance for the purpose of criminal prosecution such as ensuring the true discovery, the procedure of the rule of law and the peace of law. However, this basic human right with universal values ​​has not been given due weight in the criminal procedural law of our country. In the current trial practice, it is extremely common for witnesses not to appear in court, and the court only has to read a card by the prosecutor