论文部分内容阅读
人类在进步过程中经历了从以掠夺人口为主的“鲜花战争”到以侵占领土为主的“血腥战争,”而在21世纪初进行的“反恐战争”显然比前二者都具有更大的政治性,也即与经济和文化的全球化密切相关的政治性。丘吉尔战后在政治上的失败至少证明,卓越的战时领袖未必能够顺理成章地成为出色的战后领导者,而布什亦面临着未必能保全其尚未获得的荣誉。他为了维护美国在世界上的政治、经济和文化霸权而发动的反恐战争需要从根本上加以重新定义,只有这样才能对其正当性加以评价,据此判断其连任的可能性。
In the course of progress, mankind experienced a “bloody war” dominated by plundering population and a “bloody war” dominated by invading territories, and the “war on terror” that was carried out in the early 21st century was obviously higher than before. Both are more political, that is, they are closely related to the economic and cultural globalization. The political defeat of Churchill after the war at least proves that excellent wartime leaders may not necessarily be able to become excellent postwar leaders, and Bush also faces the possibility that he may not be able to preserve his outstanding honours. The war on terror launched by him in order to safeguard the United States’ political, economic, and cultural hegemony in the world needs to be fundamentally redefined. Only by so doing can he evaluate his legitimacy and judge the possibility of his re-election.