郑樵补充、修正许慎“六书”说,并以此来分析纷繁复杂的汉字,有一定的可取之处;同时也暴露了六书,尤其是转注、假借、兼书说分析汉字形体结构的局限性。本文着重对郑樵之“转注、假借、兼书”说进行评议,认为郑樵所列的四种转注,只有建类主义转注与其所定义的转注相吻合;假借分成有义之假借与无义之假借并不妥当;没有设立兼书说的必要。但正是这些不足之处大大启发了后代学者的研究思路,促使科学的汉字结构类型理论的形成。 Zheng Qiao added that Xu Xushen and his “Six Books” should be amended to analyze complicated Chinese characters, which has certain merits. At the same time, he also exposed six books, especially the explanation of Chinese characters Body structure limitations. This article focuses on Zheng Qiaozhi “turn around, under the guise, and the book ” said that the four kinds of Zheng Qiao listed in turn, only the constructionist turn consistent with its definition of turnaround; The falsehood is not proper; there is no need to set up a book. However, it is these deficiencies that have greatly inspired the research ideas of future generations of scholars and prompted the formation of the theory of the type structure of Chinese characters in science.