和家长接触时,提及最多的就是:课外阅读该如何指导。的确,相对于狭隘的学校教育,课外教育是广袤的天地,更是儿童成长的最佳土壤。然而,不知道多少时光因为“不得法”而浪费。在茫然时最容易的就是放弃,有人干脆提出:还童年于孩子,主张让“玩”做主。提法不错,但不知提此观点的专家面对自家孩童,这样“玩”下去是否也不管不顾呢?“还”是要“还”的,关键在于如何“还”。我提议,还给儿童一个真正有益于成长的书香童年。关于课外阅读指导的言论呈现百家争鸣之态,我相对认可 When talking with parents, the most mentioned are: how to guide extracurricular reading. Indeed, compared with the narrow school education, extra-curricular education is a vast world, it is the best soil for children to grow up. However, I do not know how much time is wasted because of “no law.” In the loss of the easiest is to give up, someone simply put forward: also childhood child, advocate let “play ” call the shots. It is not bad, but I do not know if the experts who put this point of view face their own children. Does this “play” go regardless of whether or not it continues? The key point is how to “return” ". I propose to give the children a really good childhood growth of scholarly books. There is a hundred schools of thought contending about reading instruction after class, and I am relatively accredited