在国美股权之争这个异常热闹的商业事件中,人们不自觉地分成两派,或支持陈晓或力挺黄光裕,对待结果也往往以孰胜孰负论定。站在道德角度,陈黄之争中,黄光裕似乎更易博得同情,而来自于各方面的指责将“忘恩负义”的骂名加在陈晓头上。在众人围观中,道德色彩被渲染得越来越浓。但陈黄之争发生在这样一个制度转型的特殊时期,注定了它的意义 In the Gome equity dispute this unusually bustling commercial event, people unconsciously divided into two factions, or support Chen Xiao or Huang Guangyu, the treatment of the outcome is often determined by what is better. From an ethical point of view, the battle between Chen Huang, Huang Guangyu seems more likely to win sympathy, but from all aspects of accusations will be “ungrateful,” the infamy added to the head of Chen. In the crowd, the moral colors are rendered more and more concentrated. However, the dispute between Chen and Huang took place in the special period of such a system transformation, destined to its significance