论文部分内容阅读
1988年1月,从北京传来了一条引起各方关注的信息:国家对计划外生产资料实行“全国统一最高限价”。这样做,真的有利于进一步稳定经济、深化改革吗? 可预见的“两难”实行最高限价的本意,在于稳定物价、稳定市场、稳定经济(以下简称“三稳定”),为进一步改革和发展商品经济提供较为宽松的环境。从上述目的出发,实行最高限价必然有两个互为联系的要求:一是政令要通。如果有一个地方或几个地方不执行,就不叫“全国统一”了,也就失去了该法令的作用。二是执行的结果将有利于“三稳定”,如果不利,不如
In January 1988, a message of concern from all over Beijing came from Beijing: The state imposes a “national maximum price limit” on unplanned production materials. Is this really conducive to further stabilizing the economy and deepening the reform? The original intention of implementing the ceiling price in the foreseeable “dilemma” lies in stabilizing prices, stabilizing the market and stabilizing the economy (hereinafter referred to as “the three stability”), and for further reform and Developing a commodity economy provides a more relaxed environment. Starting from the above purposes, the implementation of the ceiling price will inevitably have two requirements of mutual contact: First, the government order must be communicated. If there is a place or places not implemented, it will not be called “national unity,” and the role of the decree will be lost. Second, the result of implementation will be conducive to “three stability”, if unfavorable, it is better