相当一段时期,我们在教学、科研中对马列原著的研究很不够。有人甚至把现行哲学教科书的理论框架和体系的弱点归罪于思格斯的《反杜林论》哲学编,所谓造成了哲学教学和哲学研究中存在简单化、教条化的弊病。并说马克思思格斯的著作是19世纪的作品,对当代资本主义的新特点、社会主义的现实模式和科学技术发展的新成就均没有概括进去,因而,这些著作即便是不过时,也是没有多大现实意义的。在这些同志看来,不仅 For quite some time, we have not studied enough about the original works of Marx and Lenin in teaching and research. Some people even blamed the weaknesses of the theoretical framework and system of the existing philosophical textbooks to Sir Struck’s “Anti-Duhring” philosophy, which caused the simplification and dogma of the philosophical teaching and philosophy. Saying that the works of Marx and Sigers were works of the 19th century and were not summed up in the new features of contemporary capitalism, the socialist model of reality and the new achievements in the development of science and technology. Therefore, even if these works are not out of date, they are not What a realistic meaning. In the opinion of these comrades, not only