论文部分内容阅读
目的探究在癫痫患者的临床诊断中采用颅脑CT扫描方法进行诊断的临床价值。方法 112例癫痫患者作为研究对象,根据给予患者临床诊断方式的不同随机将其分为对照组与试验组,每组56例。对照组患者采用脑电图进行临床诊断;试验组患者则采用颅脑CT扫描方式进行临床诊断。对两组患者的诊断准确性以及患者的检查依从性进行对比分析。结果在癫痫发作期以及癫痫发作间期试验组患者的诊断准确率分别为78.79%(26/33)以及73.91%(17/23),对照组患者的诊断准确率分别为57.14%(20/35)以及61.90%(13/21),试验组的总准确率为76.79%,对照组的总准确率为58.93%;两组发作期以及发作间期的诊断准确率比较差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05),试验组总准确率高于对照组,差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。在临床检查过程中,试验组患者的检查依从率为91.07%,高于对照组的76.79%,差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论在癫痫疾病的临床诊断过程中给予患者采用颅脑CT扫描检查进行临床诊断具有准确率高且患者检查依从性高的临床优势,值得在临床广泛推广应用。
Objective To investigate the clinical value of using brain CT scan in clinical diagnosis of epileptic patients. Methods A total of 112 patients with epilepsy were enrolled in this study. According to the different clinical diagnosis, 56 cases were divided into control group and trial group. Patients in the control group were diagnosed by EEG; patients in the test group were diagnosed by brain CT scan. The diagnostic accuracy of the two groups of patients and the compliance of the patients were compared. Results The diagnostic accuracy rates of patients in the experimental group and the seizure group were 78.79% (26/33) and 73.91% (17/23), respectively. The diagnostic accuracy of the control group was 57.14% (20/35) ) And 61.90% (13/21) respectively. The overall accuracy of the experimental group was 76.79% and that of the control group was 58.93%. There was no significant difference in diagnostic accuracy between the two groups P> 0.05), the total accuracy of the experimental group was higher than that of the control group, the difference was statistically significant (P <0.05). During the clinical examination, the examination compliance rate in the test group was 91.07%, which was higher than 76.79% in the control group, the difference was statistically significant (P <0.05). Conclusion Clinical diagnosis of epilepsy patients given to patients with brain CT scan for clinical diagnosis with high accuracy and high compliance of patients with clinical advantages, it is widely used in clinical practice.