论文部分内容阅读
案情回放司机张先生是北京市某出租汽车股份有限公司(以下简称出租公司)员工,因认为出租公司未按合同约定支付福利待遇,向劳动争议仲裁委员会申请仲裁。仲裁裁决支持了张先生的主张。出租公司不服仲裁结果,将张先生起诉至法院,要求判令出租公司不支付张先生福利待遇。
The driver of the case replaces Mr. Zhang is a staff member of a taxi company limited by Beijing (hereinafter referred to as a rental company) who claims that the leasing company did not pay the benefits as agreed in the contract and applied for arbitration to the Labor Dispute Arbitration Commission. The arbitration ruling supported Mr. Zhang’s claim. The rental company refused to accept the result of the arbitration and sued Mr. Zhang to the court and ordered the rental company not to pay Mr. Zhang’s benefits.