论文部分内容阅读
《清史稿》是研究清代人物的重要史料。但在传统正史系列中,《清史稿》质量欠佳,舛误较多,亦为学界共识,其《循吏传》亦未能幸免。然而《清史稿》毕竟是一部有着较大影响的史书,其中的讹误可能会产生不小的危害,故订正其舛误很有必要。本文综合利用文集、方志、档案等各类史料,考订出《清史稿.循吏传》地名记载方面的六则错误。
“Qing Dynasty draft” is an important historical data of the Qing Dynasty. However, in the series of traditional orthodox history, the quality of the “History of the Qing Dynasty” is not good and there are many mistakes. It is also a consensus of the academic circles that its “official prosecution” has not been spared. However, “History of the Qing Dynasty” is, after all, a history book with a great influence. The corruption in it may have a great harm. Therefore, it is necessary to correct its mistakes. This article makes a comprehensive use of Collected Works, local records, archives and other historical materials to test out six mistakes in the record of geographical names in "History of the Qing Dynasty.