论文部分内容阅读
进入司法过程的各类事实是通过叙述者的修辞而建构起来的。修辞的最终目的是说服他人接受自己的论点。要使对事实的建构更具说服力,就需要借助于有效的修辞方法。每个人在司法中的形象都只能片段式地呈现,因此说话者可以使用各种素材来塑造人物形象,从而引发听众对人物行为的评价;对于一个事件具有多个证据事实的案件,说话者往往会在诸多相关的证据事实中挑选对自己有利的加以强化;而对于证据所留下的空白,则需要借助于推定进行填补;最终,修辞者对事实的建构还需要通过适合听众、切合语境的表达方式呈现出来。
All kinds of facts that enter the judicial process are constructed through narrator’s rhetoric. The ultimate goal of rhetoric is to persuade others to accept their own arguments. To make the construction of facts more convincing, we need to resort to effective rhetorical methods. Everyone’s image in the judiciary can only be presented in fragments. Therefore, the speaker can use a variety of materials to create the character image and then lead the audience to evaluate the behavior of the character. For a case where there are multiple evidence facts for an event, the speaker Tend to be selected in a number of relevant evidence to strengthen their own interests; and the gaps left by the evidence, you need to be imputed by means of presumption; Finally, the rhetorical needs of the facts by listening to the audience, to meet the language Habitat expression of the way presented.