论文部分内容阅读
据教育部一九七八年制订的《全日制十年制学校中学语文教学大纲》(试行草案)目录,鲁迅的作品选取了十八篇(其中小说九篇,杂文六篇,散文二篇,待选一篇),而郭老的作品仅仅节选了一篇戏剧。这个十八比一的悬殊比例,我们认为是不当的。这是因为:(一)、教材选取郭老的作品篇目太少,体裁也不多;(二)、对郭老在现代文学史上应有的地位,以及这位文化巨人留给我们的浩如烟海的宝贵著述的认识,还没有提到应有的高度。
According to the Catalogue of Chinese Syllabuses for Ten Years in Middle Schools (Draft) drafted by the Ministry of Education in 1978, Lu Xun selected eighteen works (of which nine were novels, six were essays, and two were prose. To be selected one), and Guo Lao’s works only selected one drama. This disparity ratio of 18 to 1, we think is inappropriate. This is because: (1) The teaching materials of Guo Lao’s works are too few and not many genres; (2) The position that Guo Lao should have in the history of modern literature and the vastness left by this cultural giant. The knowledge of valuable writing has not yet mentioned the heights it deserves.