论文部分内容阅读
2002年在中国发生的商业变局中,假如可以排除外部环境原因的话,绝大多数最终都可以归根于中国企业错综复杂的治理关系及治理现状:独立董事辞职成“现象”、监事会仍然“监”不到“事儿”、高级管理层危机频发。华尔街丑闻更给中国企业家带来了新的迷思,而他们原本就没有想太明白:中国企业的所谓公司治理,仍与管理和产权混为一团。现在,他们要做的,是既要把在美国这样一个正常的市场监管体系下产生的名词拿来借鉴,又不能完全照搬。
Of the business changes that took place in China in 2002, the vast majority eventually ended up in the intricacies of governance and governance in China: the resignation of independent directors as a “phenomenon” and the supervisory board still “jailed” To “thing”, senior management frequent crises. The Wall Street scandal has brought new myths to Chinese entrepreneurs, who did not really want to understand that the so-called corporate governance of Chinese companies is still mixed with management and property rights. Now, what they have to do is to draw not only the terminology that comes under the normal market supervision system in the United States, but also can not completely copy it.