论文部分内容阅读
19世纪后期,晚清和日本都形成各自的朝鲜地缘价值观,制定实施其各自的对朝鲜外交政策,产生了持续20年之久的中日纷争。双方的朝鲜地缘价值现有根本性的差异:晚清把朝鲜看做是“大清帝国”最重要的藩属国,清室祖宗“龙兴之地”的东边屏障和大清“京畿重地”的黄海门户,必须加以力保的地缘战略要地,对朝鲜采取了加强干涉或管控的手段;,日本把朝鲜视为其从日本列岛向东北亚大陆扩张殖民权益的必由通道,必须加以占领的地缘战略要地,对朝鲜直接采取了步步紧逼的殖民征服行动。从彼时中日纷争中应当吸取的深刻历史教训就是:建立平等尊重、互利合作的新型国际体制,才能获得东北亚地区真正和平与安全的共同保障。
In the late 19th century, the late Qing Dynasty and Japan each formed their own North Korean geopolitical values, formulated and implemented their own foreign policy toward North Korea, and created a rivalry between China and Japan that lasted for 20 years. There are fundamental differences between the two sides in the geopolitical value of North Korea: In the late Qing dynasty, North Korea was regarded as the most important vassal state of the “Qing Empire” and the eastern border of the Qing court ancestor “the land of Longxing” The gateway to the Yellow Sea in Gyeonggi Province has to be a geo-strategic point to be insured and to take measures to step up intervention or control over North Korea. Japan views North Korea as the only channel through which to expand colonial interests from the Japanese islands to the Northeast Asian mainland Must be occupied by the geostrategic strategist, North Korea took a direct step by step colonial conquest. The profound historical lesson to be drawn from the Sino-Japanese dispute at that time is that establishing a new international system of equal respect and mutually beneficial cooperation can only guarantee common peace and security in Northeast Asia.