关于“金鸡”的评述 ,我写到第 1 2届为止。前文说过 ,我的行文以亲见亲闻亲感为主。虽力求客观 ,但只能就我的艺术见解和评价标准来立论 ,因而主观的偏颇自然难于完全避免。所幸 1 2年中 ,前后列名评委者不下百人 ,他们都可以指出我的失误。艺术的评价总是见仁见智 ,或大同小 Comment on “Golden Rooster”, I wrote the first 12th so far. As mentioned above, my writing is based on pro-affection and affection. Although objectivity is objective, it can only be argued on the basis of my artistic opinions and evaluation criteria, so subjective biases can hardly be completely avoided. Fortunately, in the past 12 years, no fewer than 100 judges have been listed before and after. All of them can point out my mistake. Art evaluation is always a matter of opinion, or same size