论文部分内容阅读
古代茶史,年代湮远,或载籍阙略,或传抄窜易,或考之欠精,或妄事推测,给后人带来不少疑惑。今依个人之见,对文献中以下几点,略作考证,望指正。一、“齐荼”考宋·魏了翁《邛州先茶记》说:“茶之始,其字为荼。如春秋书齐荼……。”明·杨慎《丹铅录》也说:“茶即古荼字。周诗记荼苦,春秋书齐荼……。”言下之意,春秋的“齐荼”即“齐茶”。此说存疑。《左传·哀公五年》:“齐燕姬生子,不成而死。诸子鬻姒之子荼嬖……公疾,使国惠子、
Ancient tea history, annihilation of the age, or collection of que, or copied channeling easy, or test of underachievement, or speculation, to bring a lot of future doubts. Now according to personal opinion, the following points in the literature, a little research, hope correct. One, “Qi Tuo” test Song Wei Wei Weng “Danzhou first tea note,” said: “The beginning of the tea, the word for the tea. Spring and Autumn, such as Qi Tu ... ...” Ming Yang Shen “Dan lead recorded” also Said: “The ancient tea that is the word of tea. Zhou Poetry Tu bitter, Spring and Autumn Period book Qi ... ...” Under the meaning of the Spring and Autumn “Qi Tea” that “Qi tea.” This is doubtful. “Zuo Mourning for five years”: "Qi Yan Ji children, not died.