辨认笔录作为固定辨认活动的证据形式被广泛应用,但在实务中,司法机关对辨认笔录多采用书面审查方式,难以确保其可靠性、合法性。笔者拟通过两起案例中辨认笔录引发的思考作为分析起点,对辨认笔录的运用进行实证分析,剖析辨认笔录的证据属性,并就正确审查辨认笔录的证据能力并有效运用到实践中提出自己的建议。 Recognition of transcripts is widely used as a form of evidence for fixed identification activities. However, in practice, the judiciary often adopts a written examination of identification transcripts to ensure its reliability and legitimacy. The author intends to use two cases to identify the thinking triggered by transcripts as the starting point for analysis, the use of identification transcripts of empirical analysis, analysis and identification of transcript evidence attributes, and to correctly examine and verify the transcript evidence of the ability to effectively put into practice put forward their own Suggest.