论文部分内容阅读
过去我们在归档方面缺乏具体规定,收集来的技术档案,不够完整、正确。有些产品,本来已经定型,如果图纸齐全,在恢复生产时不需再行试制,即可投入成批生产,但由于保存的技术档案不够完整准确,就不得不从头试制。这些教训,促使我们决心重新修订技术档案管理办法。重新修订的归档制度与原有的归档制度有很多不同之处,其主要不同点是: 一、原来归档制度中,只规定了基建档案、产品档案、工艺档案的归档范围和归档要求,而且规定的比较简单。新修订的归档制度,包括了七种档案的归档范围和归档要求,有基建档案、产品档案、工艺档案、工装档案、各种定额档案、科学研究档案、技术革命技术革新档案等,包括了本厂全部技术档案。而且归档范围和归档要求规定的比
In the past, we lacks specific provisions on archiving and the technical archives collected are not complete and correct. Some products have already been finalized. If the drawings are complete, they can be put into mass production without the need of further trial production when the production is resumed. However, due to incomplete and accurate preservation of technical files, trial production has to be re-started. These lessons have prompted us to resolve to revisit the technical archives management approach. There are many differences between the revised filing system and the original filing system. The main differences are as follows: 1. In the original filing system, only the filing scope and filing requirements of the infrastructure archives, product archives and process archives are stipulated, and the provisions The more simple. The newly revised filing system includes filing scope and filing requirements for seven types of archives, including infrastructure archives, product archives, process archives, tooling archives, various quota archives, scientific research archives and technical revolution archives of technological innovation, including this Factory all technical files. And the filing scope and filing requirements specified ratio