论文部分内容阅读
威廉·莱斯与马克思都认为生态危机与资本主义制度具有某种关联,生态危机的背后蕴涵着人与人的关系,但两人也有诸多的不同之处。具体表现在三个方面:思维方式上,威廉·莱斯采用主客二分的思维方式,马克思采用感性实践的思维方式;逻辑起点上,莱斯则立足于消费异化,马克思则立足于生产力;批判路径上,威廉·莱斯采用意识形态的批判方式,马克思则通过政治经济学的批判方式。
William Rice and Marx both believe that the ecological crisis has some connection with the capitalist system. The ecological crisis behind the relationship between people and people, but there are many differences between the two. Specifically, it manifests itself in three aspects: on the mode of thinking, William Rice adopts the mode of thinking of dividing the subject and the object, and Marx adopts the way of thinking of the sensuous practice; on the starting point of logic, Rice bases on the alienation of consumption; Marx bases on the productive forces; On the other hand, William Rice adopted the ideological method of criticism while Marx adopted the critical method of political economy.