从4.14流血星期五以后,关于网站的评判和评估问题,就重新被提出来了。最近,CNNIC 第三次网站评比格外热烈,一方面网民网站参与热情高涨,一方面是连爆参评网站作弊丑闻,由此,又引发各界对评比方式、公正和代表性的议论。老网民回想当年首次评比的冷清,颇多沧桑之慨。现在网络最需要的是重新激发创业的热情和活力,艰难中的网络业需要这样一次评比,而遍观中国网络管理服务机构,CNNIC 的这次评比来得正是时候。有人认为网站乌鸦一般黑,有人指责 CNNIC 标准不清评选不 After the bloody friday from 4.14, the question of website evaluation and evaluation was again raised. Recently, the CNNIC third website was extremely enthusiastic. On the one hand, the enthusiasm of netizen websites was on the rise. On the one hand, it was a cheating scandal involving websites criticizing websites for criticism. As a result, all kinds of discussions on appraisal methods, fairness and representativeness were triggered. Old netizens recalled the first time in the year deserted, a lot of vicissitudes generous. Now most of the network is needed to rekindle the enthusiasm and vitality of entrepreneurship, the difficult network industry needs such a rating, and throughout the network management services in China, CNNIC this time it is exactly the time. Some people think the site crows generally black, some people accused CNNIC standard is not clear selection is not