论文部分内容阅读
关於太平天国史事的討論,爭執最多的要算是洪大全的有无問题了。早在光绪三十二年(一九○六)韓孔厂在他所編‘中国近世秘史’里——在引用了贺钧宰‘金壺七墨’(参文末‘附錄’)关於大全的记载之后,附加了一个案语。说: 以吾所聞於故老,实無洪大全其人。即有,亦不过一极寻常流輩。吾考之(?)籍,洪秀全曾自稱天德王(此说亦非確),初起时有將名洪天德。(見王氏(?)餘谈),郤无洪大全封天德王之事。说者謂洪氏初起,气势锐甚,官軍莫政搂其锋。赛尚阿督师久,懼谴责,乃捏造此人以欺朝廷。后世秉筆者多不察,展轉抄錄,巍成故實。中国历史之多誣,印此一端可見。後來,梁任公在他的‘中國历史研究法’里也说:
About Taiping Heavenly History of the discussion, the most disputes should be Hong Daquan whether there is any problem. As early as thirty-two years Guangxu (1906) Han hole factory in his book, “the secret history of China in the past” - quoted He Junzai ’golden pot seven ink’ (reference at the end of the appendix) Daquan records After that, a word was added. Said: I smell the old, I really did not flood the whole person. That is, there is no exception. I test the (?) Ji, Hong Xiuquan once claimed to be King (this is not true), the beginning of the name Hong Tiande. (See Wang (?) Yu Tan), but no Hongdaquan Feng Tiande Wang matter. He said Hongsheng first, sharp momentum, the official morale hug its front. Saishang Governor division for a long time, fear condemned, but fabricated this man to deceive the court. After more than I do not observe the author, exhibition transfer records, Wei Cheng fact. As many as the history of China, India can be seen at this end. Later, Liang Ren Gong also said in his ’Law of Chinese Historical Studies’: