论文部分内容阅读
看过方在庆教授的上述评论后,我想做一点补充,特此提出,供批评。一、对原书的评价对全书翻过一遍后,对原作达不到预期的满意程度。同阿伯拉罕·派斯(Abraham Pais)的同类作品相比,这本书的结构显得比较松散,欠缺对要点的概括能力;尽管材料不少,但组织得比较差。特别是第Ⅲ页说的“有些章节深入到…技术方面…那些置于卷末的材料使本书可用做…统计力学教程(或部分
After reading the above comments made by Professor Fang Zaiqing, I would like to make a few additions. I hereby submit it for criticism. First, the evaluation of the original book After the book has been repeated, the original can not reach the desired level of satisfaction. Compared to the works of Abraham Pais, the book is relatively loosely structured and lacks the ability to summarize the main points; despite the sheer number of materials, it is poorly organized. In particular, the third page says ”Some chapters go deep into ... technical aspects ... those placed at the end of the material that the book can be used to ... Statistical Mechanics tutorial (or part