论文部分内容阅读
目的对尿沉渣与尿常规在尿液检验中的相关性展开分析。方法择选我院2016年10月至2017年10月所收治的80例患者作为本文研究对象,对所选患者进行尿液样本收集,并将其按随机数字表法分成观察组与对照组,两组各40例。其中,对照组患者采用尿常规检验方式进行尿液检验,观察组患者采用尿沉渣方式进行尿液检验,对并对这两项检查结果之间的相关性展开分析与研究。结果经结果统计得出,观察组患者的红细胞、白细胞及尿蛋白的阳性率与阴性率检查结果与对照组检查结果相比无较大差异,因此不具有统计学意义(P>0.05);在符合率上,尿常规的与尿沉渣的检测符合率均较高,结果相比无较大差异,因此不具有统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论尿常规与尿沉渣这两项检查方式都存在各自的优势,临床可将两种检查方法进行联合使用,以此提高检查结果的准确率。
Objective To analyze the correlation between urine sediment and urinalysis in urinalysis. Methods Eighty patients admitted from October 2016 to October 2017 in our hospital were chosen as the subjects of this study. Urine samples were collected from selected patients and divided into observation group and control group according to random number table. 40 cases in both groups. Among them, the control group of patients with urinalysis urine test method, the observation group patients with urine sediment urine test, and the correlation between the two test results were analyzed and studied. Results The results showed that the positive rate and negative rate of erythrocyte, leukocyte and urine protein in observation group were not significantly different from those in control group (P> 0.05) The coincidence rate, urinary routine urine sediment test coincidence rate were higher, the results were no significant differences, it is not statistically significant (P> 0.05). Conclusion Both urine test and urinary sediment test have their own advantages. Clinical tests can be combined with the two test methods to improve the accuracy of test results.