论文部分内容阅读
目的探讨左氧氟沙星两种不同用药方案治疗泌尿系统感染成本效果。方法选择本院100例泌尿系统感染患者,随机分为观察组和对照组。观察组给予序贯疗法,对照组给予常规疗法。评定两组治疗效果,观察两组成本效果。结果观察组有效率与对照组比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);观察组成本为138.6元,对照组成本为256.2元。观察组成本效果为154;对照组成本效果为278.4。结论左氧氟沙星序贯疗法治疗泌尿系统感染疗效显著,且所需成本较低,优于常规疗法,值得借鉴。
Objective To investigate the cost-effectiveness of two different regimens of levofloxacin in the treatment of urinary tract infections. Methods Select 100 cases of urinary tract infection in our hospital, were randomly divided into observation group and control group. The observation group was given sequential therapy and the control group was given conventional therapy. The curative effect of two groups was evaluated and the cost effect of two groups was observed. Results The effective rate of the observation group was not significantly different from that of the control group (P> 0.05). The cost of the observation group was 138.6 yuan and that of the control group was 256.2 yuan. The effect of the observation group was 154; the cost of the control group was 278.4. Conclusion Sequential levofloxacin treatment of urinary tract infection effect is significant, and the required cost is lower than conventional therapy, it is worth learning.