论文部分内容阅读
近年来,伴随着中国的迅速崛起,“现代中国学”作为一门独立学科的出现,是一种所谓对近代的“超克”的产物,即对于西方学术界(包括日本)以往的汉学研究进行反思的产物。总体上,以往西方对中国的研究的相关论点都是一种以自我为中心、为现代社会发展之标准模范的西方文明观及价值观体系,带有浓厚的“东方主义”歧视色彩,是对非西方世界的虚无化。日本学者加加美光行教授在其《构建新的“中国学”》一文中,明确地指出了这种中国研究范式在方法论上的严重缺陷,即目的论和因果论的混淆,并提出了一种全新的“共同态度性”来克服这种研究弊病。
In recent years, along with the rapid rise of China, the appearance of “Modern Chinese Studies” as an independent discipline is a product of the so-called “super-gram” of the modern era, that is, for western academic circles (including Japan) Previous studies of Sinology reflect on the product. In general, the relevant Western arguments on China in the past are all western civilizations and values systems that are self-centered and serve as the standard model for the development of modern society and are heavily discriminated against “Orientalism.” Nothingness to the non-western world. In his article “Building a New Chinese School,” the Japanese scholar, Professor Gagame, clearly pointed out the methodological serious flaw of this Chinese paradigm, that is, the confusion of teleology and causality, and put forward A new kind of “common attitude” to overcome the drawbacks of this study.