论文部分内容阅读
本文研究对象为公民权利,采用的方法为比较研究。本文并不是从实证方面来比较国内外对人权的保护,而是光从法律条文的设计方面来研究对人权保护的不同规定。所选用的比较对象一个是国际人权公约,一个是我国的宪法。国际人权公约与我国宪法关于人权的规定是既统一又对立的关系。其对立主要表现在二者存在很多方面的差异和冲突;其统一主要表现在二者在多数方面是一致甚至是相同的。只有弄清其一致性才可能找到整合的立足点;只有厘清其差异,才不至于将二者混为一谈。
The object of this article is civil rights, and the methods adopted are comparative studies. This article does not compare the protection of human rights at home and abroad from an empirical point of view, but studies the different provisions on the protection of human rights from the perspective of the design of legal provisions. The target of comparison is one of the international human rights conventions and one of our constitutions. The international human rights conventions and our constitutional provisions on human rights are both unified and antagonistic. The main difference between the two is that there are many differences and conflicts between the two. The unity of the two lies in that they are identical or even identical in most aspects. It is only by clarifying its consistency that it is possible to find a foothold of integration; only by clarifying its differences will it not be possible to confuse the two.