二审程序中疑罪难以从无的原因第一,立法上的缺陷。首先,刑诉法没有规定二审程序可作出疑罪从无判决。根据《刑事诉讼法》第162条的规定,一审法院可以作出以下三种裁判:有罪判决、无罪判决和证据不足、指控的犯罪不能成立的无罪判决。根据该法第189条的规定,二审法院可以作出以下三种裁判:维持原判、发回重审和改判。对于原判决事实不清楚或者证据不足的,二审法院既可以在查清事实后改判,也可以裁定撤销原判,发回原审人民法院重新审判。也就是说,在 The reasons for the second trial in the case of suspicion of infringing on the first, the legislative defects. First of all, the Criminal Procedure Law does not provide for the second instance procedure to make a no-fault judgment. According to Article 162 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, the courts of first instance may make the following three decisions: conviction of guilt, acquittal and lack of evidence, and acquitted crimes that can not be substantiated. According to the provisions of Article 189 of the Act, the court of second instance may make the following three kinds of decisions: uphold the original verdict, send back a retrial and commute the sentence. If the facts of the original judgment are not clear or there is insufficient evidence, the court of second instance may either reverse the facts after finding out the facts or may ruin the original judgment and send it back to the people’s court of trial for trial. In other words,