论文部分内容阅读
法学的研究不能仅关注制度的层面,更要关注制度层面下人这个主体的行动,去发现法律在社会生活中实际的实现过程。用法社会学的理论来解读当代中国行政诉讼中法律人的活动,是一项有意义的工作。在中国,虽然行政权力总还在自身场域具有强大的作用力,但由于法律场域的扩大和影响力的增强,起支配地位的并非只是行政权力规则,法律规则与司法运作的内在逻辑同样开始发生作用,并在一定意义上约束着行政权力可能行动的范围。因此,为了维护法律场域的存在与正当性,达到一种中立性与普适性的符号化效果,法官就必须在行政权力规则与法律规则的双重逻辑之间,在情、理、法、势之间做出某种妥协与平衡。
The study of law can not only pay attention to the system level, but also pay attention to the action of the subjectivity under the system level to discover the actual process of the law in the social life. Using the theory of sociology to interpret the legal person’s activities in contemporary China’s administrative litigation is a meaningful task. In China, although the total administrative power still has a strong force in its own field, due to the expansion of the legal field and the increase of its influence, it is not only the administrative power rules that dominance, but also the inherent logic of legal rules and judicial operation Began to play a role, and to a certain extent, constrained the scope of the possible action of administrative power. Therefore, in order to maintain the existence and legitimacy of the legal field and to achieve a symbolic effect of neutrality and universality, the judge must, between the dual logic of administrative power rules and legal rules, Between the potential to make some compromise and balance.