或许名词审定工作在对书刊出版专业术语的规范作“硬性规定”时 ,忽视了对汉字字源的研究和“定名时的解释” ,又缺乏广泛征求和交换意见的渠道(笔者从未见到术语规范定稿前的面向编辑的“征求意见稿”和“定名说明”) ,有时还忽略了“语言从大众中来”的从俗原则 ,造成“硬性 Perhaps the nouns validation work ignores the study of the Chinese source word and the interpretation of the naming when it makes the “hard and fast rules” on the norm of publishing technical terms, and lacks channels for extensive solicitation and exchange of opinions (I have never seen the term For editors’ “Exposure Draft” and “Name Descriptions” before the finalization of the standard), sometimes the principle of secularism “language comes from the public” is ignored, resulting in "rigid