论文部分内容阅读
目的:对急性阑尾炎患者通过不同的手术措施,以期提高临床疗效和改善患者的生活质量。方法:将120例急性阑尾炎患者随机分组开腹手术组和保守治疗组,通过不同的手术措施对预后进行观察和数据分析。结果:两组病例预后两组手术措施术中治疗无明显差异(P>0.05),而在术后预后方面保守治疗后手术组优于开腹手术组(P<0.05)。结论:因患者的并发症不同采取不同的手术措施,不同手术措施均各有优缺点,应根据患者的不同进行个体化的选择,以期达到最佳的临床效果。
OBJECTIVE: To improve the clinical curative effect and improve the quality of life in patients with acute appendicitis by different surgical measures. Methods: A total of 120 patients with acute appendicitis were randomly divided into laparotomy group and conservative treatment group. The prognosis was observed and analyzed by different operative measures. Results: There was no significant difference between the two groups in the surgical treatment of intraoperative treatment (P> 0.05), but in the postoperative prognosis, the operation group was superior to the laparotomy group after conservative treatment (P <0.05). Conclusion: Because of the different complications of patients to take different surgical measures, different surgical measures have their own advantages and disadvantages, should be based on individual patient choice, in order to achieve the best clinical effect.