写作理论知识的学习能为写作者文从字顺地来表情达意提供更多的方便,也为他们赏析他人的文章提供了具体的门径,但对于那些浅尝辄止的学习者来说,他们对基础知识的肤浅、机械理解,也给具体的写作实践带来了不少的弊端。其中,就议论文而言,尤以两点表现得尤为突出。首先,许多教科书上都把议论文写作的基本格局归纳为:提出问题、分析问题、解决问题这一最基本的三段式。应该说,这并无可以非议的地方,问题是当学生在学习这一基本框架,并把它内化为 The study of writing theory knowledge can provide more convenience for the writers to express their feelings, and also provides a specific way for them to appreciate other people’s articles. However, for those learners who have little experience, they have basic knowledge. The superficial and mechanical understanding has also brought a lot of drawbacks to the specific writing practice. Among them, in terms of argumentation, the performance of two points is particularly prominent. First of all, many textbooks have summarized the basic pattern of argumentative writing as the most basic three-stage formula: asking questions, analyzing problems, and solving problems. It should be said that there is nothing wrong with this. The problem is when students are learning this basic framework and internalize it as