本文通过对一个道路工程争端基本案情的梳理,从上诉方与仲裁庭的视角,分析FIDIC《施工合同条件》第20.8款[争端裁决委员会任命期满]引发的“争端裁决委员会是诉讼或仲裁先决条件的例外情形”这一争端程序问题;同时从瑞士法院审判依据出发,归纳FIDIC合同条件第20.8款[争端裁决委员会任命期满]中“其他原因”一词所包含的例外情形,指导未来国际建设工程实践中的争端解决程序问题。 This paper analyzes the basic case of a road project dispute from the perspective of the appellant and the arbitral tribunal to analyze the dispute arising from FIDIC “Construction Contract Conditions” No. 20.8 [Expiration of Dispute Determination Committee expires] “Dispute Adjudication Board is litigation or arbitration The exception of the preconditions ”; and at the same time, based on the judgment of the Swiss courts, summarizes the exceptions contained in the term“ other causes ”in Section 20.8 of the FIDIC Contract [Expiration of Dispute Determination Committee] , Guiding the issue of dispute settlement procedures in the future international construction engineering practice.