依据《布鲁塞尔条例Ⅰ》第5(3)条的规定,“损害地”是法院行使特殊管辖的充分依据。然而在著作权侵权案件中,如何在网络环境下理解这两项法条中的“损害地”是法院在实践中所面临的一个难题。欧洲法院最近裁决的Pez Hejduk案是涉及网络著作权侵权的典型案件。在Pez Hejduk案中,欧洲法院认为,在网络著作权侵权案件中,法院依“损害地”行使特殊管辖时,可以该网站的“可登入性”作为界定标准。 Pursuant to section 5 (3) of the Brussels Ordinance, “damage land” is a sufficient basis for the courts to exercise special jurisdiction. However, in the case of copyright infringement, how to understand the “damage land” in the two laws under the network environment is a difficult problem that the court faces in practice. The recent case of Pez Hejduk ruled by the European Court of Justice is a typical case involving online copyright infringement. In the case of Pez Hejduk, the European Court of Justice held that in the case of copyright infringement on the Internet, the court may use the “loginability” of the website as a criterion when exercising special jurisdiction under “damage land”.