古典文学领域里最传统、最古老的研究方法是以史证文,这种实证研究对深入了解作品的背景,准确解析文本的内涵是有积极意义的。但文学与历史分属两个不同学科,承担着不同的使命,要分别解决不同的问题,我们用史料和实证的方法解析文学时,会发现二者之间存在着张力,仍会让我们陷入解读困境,故以史证文也是存在局限的,我们不能一味迷信这一传统研究方法,应该积极反思,并与时俱进,革故开新,寻找新的、更加有效的方法。 The most traditional and oldest research method in the field of classical literature is based on historical evidence. This empirical study is of positive significance for understanding the background of the work in depth and for accurately analyzing the connotation of the text. However, literature and history belong to two different disciplines and bear different missions. Different problems must be solved separately. When we analyze the literature by means of historical materials and empirical methods, we find that there is tension between the two and will still trap us Therefore, we should not blindly believe in this traditional research method. We should actively reflect on it and keep pace with the times. We should make new achievements and find new and more effective methods.