论文部分内容阅读
近年来对师范教育史的研究有所发展,这是好事。但是,有些研究文章史实有误,很不负责。去年八月十六日《光明日报》第三版雷克啸同志的《张謇与师范教育》一文,就存在这个问题。雷文七处提到“通州师范学堂”。其实,张謇创办的师范学校,最初称为“民立通州师范学校”,从未叫过“通州师范学堂”。这有《张季子九录》中的《教育录》六卷为证。张謇办师范之始,有过将学校称为“师范学堂”之议,后从通州学者王漱六的意见,决定称学校而不称学堂。雷文中又说:“张謇精心择师,延聘王国维教伦理学,心理学,朱东润教语文课,还请了十几名日本教员”。说张謇办通州师范精心择师这一点是对的,延聘王国维和日本教员任教也是对的。但是,朱东润一九一九年从美国留学回来,到通州师
In recent years, there has been some research on the history of teacher education, which is a good thing. However, some research articles have historical facts and are not responsible for them. This question exists on the article “Zhang 謇 and Teacher Education” by Lei Kexiao, the third edition of Guangming Daily on August 16 last year. Lei Wen seven mentioned “Tongzhou Normal School.” In fact, Zhang Jian’s normal school was originally called “Minli Tongzhou Normal School”, and never called “Tongzhou Normal School.” This is evidenced by the six volumes of “Education Record” in “Nine Seasons Records by Zhang Jizi”. At the very beginning of Zhang Fan’s training of teachers, there was a proposal to call the school a “normal school”, after which he decided to call the school “not a school,” from the opinion of Tongzhou scholar Wang Shu-liu. Lei Wenzhong added: “Zhang Kui carefully selected teachers, hired Wang Weixiao ethics, psychology, Zhu Dongrun taught language lessons, but also invited a dozen Japanese teachers.” It is correct to say that Zhang Yong did well in Tongzhou Normal School, and it is also right to hire Wang Guowei and Japanese teachers to teach him. However, Zhu Dongrun returned from the United States in 1919 and returned to Tongzhou Division