论文部分内容阅读
笔者曾经指出唐钺、刘笑敢先生所用以论证《庄子》内篇比外杂篇早出的方法,存在问题。刘笑敢先生对于笔者的质疑作了解答,笔者为此进一步讨论相关的问题,指出刘先生的解释仍然存在问题,不能充分证明《庄子》内篇比外杂篇早出。目前,虽然证明《庄子》内篇比外杂篇早出不成功,但是王叔岷先生的破除内外杂篇观念的观点,笔者也不能完全接受。看来《庄子》内外杂篇关系的问题,仍然有待进一步研究。
The author once pointed out that there are problems with the methods used by Tang Kui and Liu Xiaogan to justify the internalization of Chuang Tzu’s texts over the extra-curricular ones. Mr. Liu Xiaogan made an answer to the author’s questioning. The author further discussed the related issues and pointed out that Mr. Liu’s explanation still exists. At present, although it proves that “Chuang-tzu” was unsuccessful earlier than the extra-curricular articles, Wang Shumin’s point of view of dispelling the miscellaneous articles both inside and outside the country can not be completely accepted by the author. It seems that the issue of the relationship between miscellaneous articles inside and outside Zhuangzi remains to be further studied.