论文部分内容阅读
学者们对行政垄断概念的界定存在以下两个方面的问题:一是对行政垄断的主体的概括不够准确,或过于狭窄或过于宽泛;二是或未能反映出行政垄断的违法本质或将滥用行政权力与违法行使行政权力混为一谈。行政垄断的主体是且只能是拥有行政权力的组织,包括行政机关和依法律、法规授权而行使特定行政职能的非国家机关组织,根据行政法学理论,可将之既简明又完整地表述为“行政主体”。行政垄断不仅仅是“滥用行政权力”的行为,更是“违法行使行政权力”的行为。行政垄断的概念可界定为:行政垄断是行政主体违法行使行政权力,排除、限制竞争的行为。
Scholars have two problems on the definition of the administrative monopoly: First, the generalization of the subject of administrative monopoly is not accurate enough or too narrow or too broad; Second, it fails to reflect the essence of the illegal monopoly or abuse Administrative power and illegal exercise of administrative power are confused. The main body of administrative monopoly is and can only be an organization with administrative power, including administrative organs and organizations of non-state organs that exercise certain administrative functions authorized by laws and regulations. According to the theory of administrative jurisprudence, it can be described as both concise and complete “Administrative body ”. Administrative monopoly is not only an act of “abuse of administrative power”, but also an act of “illegally exercising administrative power”. The concept of administrative monopoly can be defined as: Administrative monopoly is the administrative body illegally exercising administrative power to exclude and restrict competition.