论文部分内容阅读
殖民主义戴维·斯科特本文使用对克林伍德关于“问答”逻辑这一概念的解读方式以反思塔拉尔·阿萨德向人类学提出的挑战。阿萨德认为人类学应当改变它思考殖民主义问题的方式，主张转移研究的重点，从撰写殖民地人类学的历史转而撰写西方霸权的人类学（或者换一个提法：后殖民主义现在时的历史人类学。“ｈｉｓｔｏｒｉｃａｌａｎｔｈｒｏｐｏｌｏｇｉｅｓｏｆｔｈｅｐｏｓｔｃｏｌｏｎｉａｌｐｒｅｓｅｎｔ”）。本文特别详细说明了阿萨德的挑战必须据以理解的部分证据的环境或曰概念—政治的问题空间（ｔｈｅｄｉｓｃｕｒｓｉｖｅｃｏｎｔｅｘｔｏｒｃｏｎｃｅｐｔｕａｌ＿ｐｏｌｉｔｉｃａｌｐｒｏｂｌｅｍ＿ｓｐａｃｅ）———第三世界各个主权国家的民族解放规划（ｎａｔｉｏｎａｌｉｓｔ／ｌｉｂｅｒａｔｉｏｎｉｓｔｐｒｏｊｅｃｔ）———即万隆规划———以失败告终的环境，以及比较系统地了解现代权威的各种形式之不同一般的重要性———我们的当代世界其所以呈如此状态，正是这种权威造成的。最后，本文讨论了关于了解加勒比奴隶解放后期的历史（ｐｏｓｔｅｍａｎｃｉｐａｔｉｏｎｈｉｓｔｏｒｙ）这一问题，从而说明后殖民主义现代的历史人类学的概念。
Colonialism David Scott This article uses the way in which Clintwood interprets the notion of “logic in questioning” to reflect on the challenges that Talal Assad poses to anthropology. Assad argues that anthropology should change the way it thinks about colonialism by advocating a shift in the focus of the study, from the history of colonial anthropology to the anthropology of Western hegemony (or, to put it another way: postcolonialism now Historical anthropology. “Historicalanthropologiesofthepostcolonialpresent”). This article details in detail the environmental or conceptual aspects of Assad’s challenge, which some of the evidence for which it is necessary to understand - the thediscursivecontextorconceptual_politicalproblem_space - the nationalist liberation project of the sovereign nations of the Third World, --- that is, the Bandung plan --- an environment that ends in failure and the more general importance of the various forms of modern authority that are systematically understood - and why it is so in our contemporary world Authority caused. Finally, the article discusses the issue of understanding postemancipation history in the late post-liberation period of the Caribbean to illustrate the concept of modern post-colonial anthropology of history.