论文部分内容阅读
本文逐项具体分析了专家组及上诉机构对GATT第20条(b)、(g)两项中所含各项具体条件的解释和适用,揭示了WTO争端解决机制与GATT争端解决机制对第20条环境例外条款解释的异同及其原因,指出WTO争端解决机制对于有效解决环境与贸易争端发挥了创造性的作用,但是在WTO现有法律框架内,专家组,尤其是上诉机构在解决环境贸易争端过程中使用的解释方法仍存在值得商榷之处。
This article analyzes the interpretation and application of the specific conditions contained in Article 20 (b) and (g) of Article 20 of the GATT by the panel and the appellate body one by one, revealing the relationship between the WTO dispute settlement mechanism and the GATT dispute settlement mechanism. It also points out that the WTO dispute settlement mechanism has played a creative role in effectively resolving environmental and trade disputes. However, within the existing WTO legal framework, the panel of experts, especially the appellate body, The methods of interpretation used in the dispute are still debatable.