论文部分内容阅读
选取在中国具影响力的8种优秀药学期刊,比较分析其在CNKI和Scopus数据库的文献计量学指标的差异,结果显示8种期刊在CNKI和Scopus数据库中的计量学指标排序变动较大,除了《中国药理学报》其他7种期刊在Scopus的被引频次主要由国内期刊和作者贡献,表明目前中国优秀药学期刊的国际化程度及学术影响力仍有待提高。《中国天然药物》在Scopus数据库中的指标整体上略优于除了《中国药理学报》的其他6刊,为该刊2012年被SCI收录提供了计量学依据。本文提出可利用Scopus数据库对国内期刊进行国际影响力评估;并指出中国药学期刊应准确定位,而不是盲目国际化。
The eight influential journals in China were selected and their differences in bibliometrics between CNKI and Scopus databases were compared. The results showed that the order of the metrological indexes of CNKI and Scopus databases varied greatly The citation frequency of the other 7 journals in Chinese Pharmacological Journal in Scopus is mainly contributed by domestic journals and authors, indicating that the internationalization and scholarly influence of excellent Chinese journals are yet to be improved. The overall index of “China Natural Medicine” in the Scopus database is slightly better than the other six publications except for the Chinese Journal of Pharmacology, which provided a metrological basis for its inclusion in SCI in 2012. This paper proposes that the Scopus database can be used to assess the international influence of domestic journals. It also points out that Chinese pharmacopeial journals should be accurately positioned rather than blindly internationalized.