论文部分内容阅读
自中国人民志愿军发起第一次战役后,除了以积极防御为主要特点的第四次战役外,其他几次战役都伴随着对停战谈判的考虑,有关停战的设想和条件不断变化,而且每次都涉及战役目标与军事战略之间的关系。有关的各种意见和决策从根本上说,始终联系着对“战争局部化”和由此界定的战略利益、制定的军事战略的本质的理解、背离或贯彻。停战谈判决策形成的过程表明,中国决策层在不同阶段对战场形势和双方军事力量对比的认识和判断,在特定时期起着关键性的作用,而这些认识和判断往往是由复杂的因素造成的,是在持续的争论中形成的。
Since the Chinese People’s Volunteers launched their first campaign, with the exception of the fourth campaign featuring active defense, the other battles were accompanied by consideration of truce negotiations. The assumptions and conditions regarding the cease-fire were constantly changing, and each time All involve the relationship between the objectives of the campaign and the military strategy. The various opinions and decisions concerned are fundamentally linked to the understanding, departure or implementation of the essence of the military strategy formulated by “localization of the war” and the strategic interests defined thereby. The process of shaping truce negotiations and decisions shows that the understanding and judgment made by Chinese decision-makers at different stages on the battlefield situation and the comparison of military forces between the two sides play a crucial role at a specific time and these perceptions and judgments are often caused by complicated factors , Is formed in the ongoing debate.