论文部分内容阅读
结合经济比例失调问题,我国经济界曾于60年、81年两次就生产资料是否优先增长问题进行过全面讨论。两次规模范围都很大,但都没有取得实质性统一。两种截然对立观点(生产资料生产必须优先增长和不一定优先增长)各有秋色。终其原因,要么是没对两部类数量关系进行定量分析,要么是没对其中多重因素进行综合分析,要么是纯粹搬弄条文而离开我国建设实践。因为这问题直接关系到今后我国国民经济能否有计划按比例发展的大问题,因此本文想作一次偿试性综合分析。
In the light of the imbalance of economic proportions, the economic circles of our country conducted a comprehensive discussion on whether the prioritized growth in means of production had been conducted in 60 or 81 years. Both were large-scale, but none achieved substantial reunification. Two diametrically opposed points of view (that the means of production must be prioritized and not necessarily preferentially) have autumn colors. The ultimate reason is either that there is no quantitative analysis of the relationship between the two types of quantity or that there is no comprehensive analysis of the multiple factors therein or whether it is a purely allegation of leaving the construction practice in our country. Because this issue is directly related to the future of our national economy can be planned to scale the development of large issues, this article would like to make a comprehensive analysis of the trial.