A Virtue or an Obligation?

来源 :Beijing Review | 被引量 : 0次 | 上传用户:wujunming123123
下载到本地 , 更方便阅读
声明 : 本文档内容版权归属内容提供方 , 如果您对本文有版权争议 , 可与客服联系进行内容授权或下架
论文部分内容阅读
  It was reported that in Hangzhou, east China’s Zhejiang Province, a youth was recently slapped in the face repeatedly when he refused to give up his seat for a young couple holding a baby. And in Ji’nan, east China’s Shandong Province, a mother slapped a man on the bus after nobody offered their seat to her 3-year-old child. These incidents are raising questions about bus and subway customs, an unspoken social etiquette in China determining who will sit and who will stand. Offering seats to those in need, such as seniors, pregnant women or people with babies, has been a traditional virtue of Chinese, but now it seems some passengers are rebelling against the “rules”of riding, and questioning why the tickets they bought do not entitle them to seating privileges. This phenomenon has also aroused debate among the public. The following are excerpts of some opinions.
  Wang Wuzhong (paper.dzwww. com): Offering your seat to those in need on the bus is a social virtue. The old, the weak, the ill and the pregnant need more care, so the whole society should give them special consideration. Even in the animal world, there are cases of the strong helping the weak. On buses or subways, the weaker group is clearly defined. We need to offer a helping hand to those less able than ourselves when we are comparatively strong.
  However, giving up one’s seat is ultimately a moral issue, not a legal obligation. There are two codes to standardize human behaviors: one is morality and the other is the law. The maintenance of moral standards depends on self-discipline and public opinion, not violence or coercion.
  Even when encountering a thief, it is better to solve the dispute through legal means than to get involved in a personal brawl. Overreacting to an affront of one’s rights and interests could lead to violating the law and worsening matters. Like any other case, the bus seat issue should be dealt with rationally, rather than through violence.
  
  Yuaner (youth.cn): Every passenger has to buy a ticket to ride the bus. Thus, all passengers share the same obligation and rights on board. No laws have stipulated that a certain passenger must offer his or her seat to someone else and no one should force someone else to offer you their seats. Offering your seat to the weak or the elderly is a virtue that we hope will be further promoted, but it is by no means a compulsory social moral code.
  Chinese laws do not stipulate that the young must offer seats to those in need. Since this is not an obligation, if anyone has offered his or her seat to others, they should be praised and thanked by those receiving the seat. More importantly, since this is not a requirement, each passenger has the right to decide whether to offer the seat or not. Thus, no one has the right to criticize or denounce others for not following the custom.
  It is virtuous to offer one’s own seat to others, but declining to do so is not a sign of moral regression. It is merely one’s right to decide whether or not to do the act of kindness. The Chinese tend to see such moral issues in black and white. The seat-offering debate is no exception. Some even point to the bus seat controversy as a sign of social indifference and moral decay.
  On buses there are special seats for the elderly, the pregnant, the sick and the disabled. In normal circumstances, healthy young people are expected to stand while the less fit can sit. But whereas old, seriously disabled and pregnant people can be easily identified, it’s not easy to tell who is ill and who is lightly disabled. For example, the young man who was slapped on the bus in Hangzhou had an injured leg that was not obviously seen.
  Young people also have the right to safeguard their seats if they feel uncomfortable. In Taiwan’s subways, young people can apply for a tag when they feel uncomfortable, which will give them the right to sit on special seats for those in need.
  Morality demands that people regulate their own behavior, but not that of others. People differ from each other in their viewpoints, of course. If they think someone’s moral standard is lower than their own, they should be alert, but are not supposed to take violent actions. Sadly, in reality, people tend to demand high moral standards from others while failing to hold themselves to the same standards.
  Slapping the youth for not offering his seat does not defend morality; instead, it delivers a blow to morality in itself. The moral code should not be abused to police others, but should be a goal to improve oneself.
  Not offering seats to others will not lead to moral degradation. People should learn to respect others’ freedom and right to not give up their seats, and then the virtue of offering seats will naturally follow. Those who force others to do so are using morality to cover their private impulses and greed.
  Fu Cheng (City Evening News): Surrendering seats to those in need is an extra care for the weak, but it is not stipulated in laws. The proper attitude to take is: praise those who participate, but don’t blame those who do not. However, most people tend to go extreme on this issue.
  The most important thing is for all people to first mind their own behavior.
  Li Kejie (Chengdu Business Daily): In the past, not contributing a seat to others did not result in open scolding. But now, if the young do not offer their seats, they are at risk of assault from angry passengers.
  Undoubtedly, the passengers who slap others have a conflict between moral obligations and legal obligations. In this case, they think young people must contribute their seats as a legal obligation. If young people refuse, they must be punished. With this in mind, certain people become indignant and want to attack those who do not offer them seats. Nevertheless, offering seats is not a legal obligation, so you can only expect people to do so by their own will, and not through violence.
  Offering one’s seats to others is a virtue that should be greatly encouraged, but we cannot force this on the young. It is a selfish practice to hurt others just because they do not conform to your moral code.
  Qiu Yun (www.shipingjie.net): If the couple had asked politely whether they could have the seat, this conflict could have been avoided. Even if the youth was healthy and did not have a leg injury, the husband of the couple should not have resorted to violence. His action was even more offensive. If you want others to treat you with respect, you must first learn to treat others kindly. It is better to show kindness and ask politely when you want to take a seat.
其他文献
插花,指将剪切下来的植物枝、叶、花、果作为素材,经过一定的技术(修剪、整枝、弯曲等)和艺术(构思、造型、设色等)加工,重新配置成一件精致完美、富有诗情画意,能再现大自然和生活之美的艺术品。是一种以“花”为主要素材,在瓶、盘、碗、缸、简、篮、盆等七大花器内营造无穷奥妙的一种盆景类花卉艺术,其表现方式颇为雅致,令人把玩,爱不释手。在古代,插花与“焚香”“点茶”“挂书”同称四艺,受到众多文人雅士的喜爱。
摘 要:地质矿产工作在国民经济发展中有着十分关键的基础性、先行性作用,与经济社会发展密切关联,伴随我国工业化、城镇化进程逐步推进,地质矿产工作推动区域经济发展的有效作用进一步显现。文章通过阐述地质矿产及其现状,分析地质矿产工作推动区域经济发展,对充分发挥地质矿产推动区域经济发展的策略展开探讨,旨在为如何深化地质矿产工作,推动区域经济有序发展研究适用提供一些思路。  关键词:地质矿产;区域经济;发展
期刊
摘 要:台湾地区的农业发展较早且趋于成熟,积累了丰富的经验,休闲农业更是台湾地区农业的代表,根植于农业、结合观光旅游、同时保有乡土民俗,使农业功能升级换代。本考察报告通过对台湾地区休闲观光农业成功经验的总结和剖析,指出对我公司进行农业板块投资的借鉴意义。  关键词:休闲观光农业;农业板块投资  台湾地区的农业发展较早,80年代初,台湾地区开始推行观光农园,后期政府又推行“农业+旅游业”性质的休闲农
北京奥运会男子110米栏的比赛,雅典奥运会冠军刘翔因伤遗憾地退出比赛,后被证实为脚跟腱末端损伤。跟腱末端损伤。这似乎是一种比较“专业”的疾病,其实,如果没有合理的运动保健,普通健身者也有可能出现跟腱末端损伤。  末端病属于运动技术伤,肌腱末端就是肌腱的止点或者说是肌腱与骨连接的部分,这部分组织因劳损而引起的组织变性改变就叫做末端病。这种病在运动员中十分常见,如髌腱末端病、肩袖末端病等。其病因为超负
随着新课程实施的深入和中学英语教学改革的发展,如何构建高效的中学英语课堂,成为中学英语教学的重要课题.在新课程的背景下,更加需要调动学生积极性,使其主动参与课堂教学.
期刊
对我科1995~1999年五年间收治的67例6岁以下小儿烧伤并发中毒性脑病的临床资料进行分析,探讨小儿烧伤并发中毒性脑病的防治措施。1 临床资料五年间,我科共收治12岁以下患儿63
随着经济水平的不断提高,人们对于精神文化要求也越来越高.在这个新时代,如何开展民族地区的群众文化工作呢?我们应当顺应时代要求,改变传统发展的思路,采用新的方式方法和新
【摘要】财务管理是高校管理的重要组成部分。本文将以A高校的财务管理为基础,分析其问题以及成因,并努力探究其发展方向,为未来高校的发展奠定良好的基础。  【关键词】新时期 高校 财务管理  目前,高校的内部控制主要是通过财务管理。何谓财务管理?它就是通过高校资金运作情况的管理。作为高校的财务管理者,更需要积极转变自身的观念,通过建立良好的财务管理制度,才能促成自身的发展[1]。随着市场经济的持续发展