论文部分内容阅读
本文认为：所谓“七平均律”，并不真正“平均”。它以“七反” 为其目的，在一定的“调性逻辑框架” 中，对某种类型的音阶进行移调演奏。在移调演奏实践中，所谓“七平均律” 中音律并不“平均”的音阶各音，在调性逻辑框架中处于“平等”的地位。因之，所谓“七平均律”似乎应该易名为“七反律”。如此，则可消除律学同人因“七平均律” 中音律究竟“平均与否” 而引起的不必要的争执。
This article argues that the so-called “seven-equal law” does not really “average.” With the purpose of “seven oppositions”, it transposes certain types of scales in a certain “logical framework of tonality”. In the transposition performance practice, the so-called “seven average law” in the tone is not “average” scales of tone, in tonal logic framework in an “equal” position. Therefore, the so-called “seven-equal law” seems to be renamed “the seven anti-law”. In this way, it is possible to eliminate unnecessary disputes caused by law students due to the “average or not” of the temperament in “the seven-mean law”.