理论和实践的矛盾股份制在我国有无必要实行和怎样实行?已经讨论了好几年,在实践中也有了一些零星的试点经验,但从总体上看没有真正解决,明显地表现出两个突出矛盾: 一是理论争论中分歧很大,“万能论”和“取消论”各执一端。“万能论”认定,股份制是医治中国经济百病的最好药方,可以用这种“混合所有制”解决商品经济与公有制之间的矛盾。“取消论”则断言:股份制是化大公为小私,是将公有制变为私有制的一种形式,实际上会取消社会主义经济。现实生活表明,这两种观点都有片面性。首先,股份制的性质取决于哪一种成分(股份)占主导地位,在公有股份占优势的条件下完全可以成为公有制的一种 The contradiction between theory and practice of the shareholding system in our country whether it is necessary to implement and how to implement? Has been discussed for several years, in practice there are also some sporadic pilot experience, but in general there is no real solution, obviously two prominent contradictions : First, there are great differences in theoretical debates, and the ends of “omnipotent theory” and “abolitionist theory.” The theory of “omnipotence” finds that the shareholding system is the best remedy for treating all kinds of economic problems in China. This kind of “mixed ownership” can be used to solve the contradiction between commodity economy and public ownership. On the basis of “cancellation theory,” the assertion is made that the shareholding system is a form of self-government that turns public ownership into private ownership and virtually eliminates the socialist economy. Real life shows that both views are one-sided. First of all, the nature of the shareholding system depends on which component (share) prevails and can become a publicly owned system under the condition that public shares are dominant