论文部分内容阅读
一千多年以来,有关中国政治史、哲学史、文学史、教育史的论著都讲到“韩柳之争”,可是结论大抵都是“扬韩抑柳”。韩愈死后,封建皇帝追赠他为“礼部尚书”,谥曰“文”,成为唐朝的名公;而柳宗元则无声无息地死在柳州,被人说成政治上不够稳重,误入歧路。这真是历史的颠倒。毛主席教导我们:“必须将古代封建统治阶级的一切腐朽的东西和古代优秀的人民文化即多少带有民主性和革命性的东西区别开来。”韩柳之争,实质上是儒法之争。下面仅从韩柳教育思想方面试举几例就可以看出,在师道问题上韩柳各树一帜,区别泾渭分明。
For more than a thousand years, the treatises on Chinese political history, the history of philosophy, the history of literature, and the history of education all talk about the “battle between Han and Liu.” However, the conclusion is probably that “Yang Han will suppress Liu”. After the death of Han, the feudal emperors chased him as “the Book of Rites,” saying “wen” and became a famous official in the Tang Dynasty. Liu Zongyuan died in Liuzhou silently and was said to be politically unstable and misguided . This is really a reversal of history. Chairman Mao taught us: “All the decadent things of the ancient feudal ruling class must be distinguished from the ancient, excellent people’s culture, that is, how democratic and revolutionary things are.” The battle between Han and Liu is essentially a dispute between Confucianism and law. Here are just a few examples from the Han Liu educational thought can be seen on the issue of teachers and students will be unique, the difference is quite clear.