论文部分内容阅读
人文社会科学研究成果评价的理论基础是价值论,哲学价值论决定了评价问题首先应该是评价主体的选择问题,经济学价值论则阐释了科研成果背后的研究基础、资金投入与人力资源投入等价值源头问题。创新思想是评价的核心标准,研究规范是评价的基础标准,学术价值与社会价值则是评价的重要标准。评价指标构成主要包括创新程度、完备程度、价值含量与研究投入四个方面,其中前三项为成果质量评价指标,结合研究投入指标的综合分值合成,才是对研究成果的最后价值评价。
The theoretical basis of the evaluation of humanities and social science research results is the theory of value. The philosophical value theory determines that the evaluation problem should be the choice of the evaluation subject at first. Economic value theory expounds the research foundation, capital investment and human resource investment behind the research results. Value source problem. Innovative thinking is the core standard of evaluation. Research standard is the basic standard of evaluation. Academic value and social value are the important criteria of evaluation. The composition of the evaluation index includes four aspects: degree of innovation, degree of completeness, value content and investment in research. The first three of them are the evaluation indicators of the quality of the result, combined with the synthetic score of the research investment index, which is the final value evaluation of the research results.