论文部分内容阅读
近年理论界对社会科学与生产力关系问题展开了大讨论。在社会科学为什么是生产力、社会科学是什么样的生产力等问题上存在着不同意见的纷争,在作为第一生产力的科学技术是否包括社会科学这一热点问题上争衡更为激烈。在问题的论证中存在着二律背反。二律背反观点的症结是形成相反命题结论的根因,一些基础范畴的重新科学界定是解决二律背反的基本前提。发挥社会科学转化为生产力需要创造有利条件和环境。
In recent years, theorists have held great discussions on the relationship between social science and productivity. There is a disagreement over issues such as why social sciences are productive forces and what kind of social sciences are productive forces. The issue of whether science and technology as the primary productive forces include social sciences is even more fiercely contested. There is a paradox in the argument of the problem. The crux of the antinomian viewpoint is the root cause of the conclusion of the opposite proposition. The re-scientific definition of some basic categories is the basic premise for solving the antinomy. Transforming social sciences into productive forces needs to create favorable conditions and an environment.