当人们欲使他人相信某一事实时,最好是用证据来证明。法院审理案件是弄清事实、适用法律的过程、所以法院所确认的事实,法律规定必须要证据来加以证明。而证明过程及结果最终体现在法院的裁判书中。然而,多年来我国法院的裁判书在陈述完查明的事实后,甚少写明有什么证据以及对证据的分析和评价,只笼而统之一句话:“以上事实,证据确凿、充分”。这样简单做实际上是省略了证明过程,缺乏说服力。证据确凿是指每一证据都确实可靠,证据充分是指每一待证事实部有充足的证据证实。因而,证据确 When people want to convince others of a fact, it is best to prove it with evidence. The court hearing the case is to clarify the facts, the process of application of the law, so the court confirmed the facts, the law must be evidence to prove it. The proof process and the results are ultimately reflected in the court’s decision. However, after many years of reviewing the facts of the court’s judgments, it has seldom indicated any evidence as well as the analysis and appraisal of the evidences. Only one sentence in the most general terms: “the above facts, the evidence is conclusive and sufficient” . This simple to do is actually omitted the proof process, lack of persuasion. Evidence does mean that each piece of evidence is credible, with sufficient evidence that there is sufficient evidence for each piece to be verified. Thus, the evidence is correct